Problem is, library dependencies are hard-coded at compile-time (even though they're *dynamic* libraries). Oh, but this is one tricky problem, and the culprit is more than just the package management or whatever. With friends like you, we really don't need any enemies. The net result being a more pretentious, slower, buggier re-implementation of half of common Windows.Ī fie upon you, fuckwits. But the system chugged along.īut no, Ubuntu needs everything for everything else, because it's packaged by a bunch of intellectually lazy apes. Without the uninstalled bit, whatever it was. I used to be perfectly able to uninstall any fucking anything I wanted in MS-DOS, and the system chugged along. Why ? Can nautilus not work without internet ? Then why does it depend on netbase! What's ntfs-3g need webs for ? Gnome-sudoku needs netbase, seriously ? What the Thomas Hinkle's whore of a mother for! What does gvfs need netbase for ? KBD! KBD fucking depends on netbase. There's no motherfucking Joseph on a stick reason gnome-disk-utility should depend on netbase. There's no reason gdm should depend on netbase. There's no reason compiz should depend on netbase. There is no motherfucking reason conceivable or inconceivable that x.org should depend on netbase.
Acquire a generic system with a > 1 TB HDD.If this is not directly obvious to you, let's consider two pretty decent benchmarks.įirst proof that Ubuntu is a worse piece of shit than MS-DOS ever was :
